The Suit of clothes or the suit of Armer both are for Men.

You're correct to raise the statute of limitations, as it's a critical factor in evaluating the legal context of the "Katie Johnson" lawsuit mentioned in the post. Let's break this down based on the available information and current legal standards, keeping in mind the timeline and jurisdiction involved.

Timeline and Jurisdiction
  • The alleged incident occurred in the summer of 1994, with the lawsuit filed in 2016 in a California federal court.
  • The plaintiff claimed she was 13 at the time of the alleged assault, meaning the event would have taken place approximately 22 years before the lawsuit was initiated.
Statute of Limitations for Sexual Assault in California (1994 Context)
  • In 1994, California's statute of limitations for civil claims related to sexual assault was generally two years from the date of the incident (California Code of Civil Procedure § 340). For minors, the clock typically began when they reached the age of majority (18), giving a potential window of up to two years after turning 18—so, by 1999, for a 1994 victim.
  • However, the lawsuit was filed in 2016, well beyond this period, suggesting the standard statute of limitations had indeed expired unless an exception applied.
Exceptions and Changes in Law
  • Discovery Rule: This allows the statute of limitations to start when the victim discovers or reasonably should have discovered the harm. The plaintiff might have argued that psychological trauma delayed her ability to come forward, but no evidence or court ruling supports this in the withdrawn case.
  • Legislative Changes: California has since extended statutes of limitations for childhood sexual assault. For example, California Code of Civil Procedure § 340.1, amended over the years, now allows claims for childhood sexual assault to be filed up to age 26 or within three years of discovering the injury (e.g., via repressed memory), with revival windows for older claims. However, these changes (e.g., AB 2777 in 2022) apply retroactively only to incidents on or after January 1, 2009, or specific revival periods (e.g., until December 31, 2026, for some instances). The 1994 incident predates these reforms, so they wouldn't directly apply unless a special revival window existed in 2016, which it did not at that time.
  • Federal Jurisdiction: Since the case was filed in federal court, it may have invoked diversity jurisdiction or federal law; however, civil sexual assault claims typically follow state law for statutes of limitations. New York, where the alleged act occurred, had a similar two-year limit in 1994 for personal injury, with a minor extension to age 19, still expiring by 2000.
Why the Lawsuit Was Filed in 2016
  • The plaintiff's attorney, Lisa Bloom, suggested that the filing was timed to coincide with a one-year revival window under New York's Adult Survivors Act (ASA), enacted in 2022, which allowed claims from 2001 onward to be filed by November 24, 2023. However, this law postdates the 2016 filing by six years and doesn't apply retroactively to 1994 incidents in the context of 2016.
  • In 2016, no such broad revival existed in California or New York. The case likely relied on a legal theory (e.g., tolling due to threats or incapacity), but without court adjudication, this remains speculative. The voluntary withdrawal suggests the plaintiff couldn't overcome the time-bar defense.
ConclusionYes, the statute of limitations had almost certainly run out by 2016 under the laws applicable in 1994 (California or New York). The two-year window post-minority (by 1999) had long passed, and no evidence indicates a valid exception or revival law was in place at the time of filing. The case's dismissal without prejudice—allowing refiling if new evidence or a legal basis emerged—further implies it faced insurmountable procedural hurdles, likely including the expired statute. This aligns with critiques in the X thread (e.g.,
@honeyybomb
, post 1985438661660356628) noting the claim's lack of legal weight due to its procedural history.If you're interested, I can delve deeper into how modern laws might retroactively impact similar cases or explore the Epstein-Trump connection further, based on the 2024-2025 file releases. What do you think?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How does the placebo effect fit into the eighth dynamics?

Image
  How does the placebo effect fit into the eighth dynamics? In Scientology, the placebo effect, which demonstrates the mind's power to influence the body, is understood through the lens of the Eight Dynamics, with a particular focus on the role of the individual's spiritual being (thetan), their beliefs, and their ability to effect change.   Here's how it fits: Seventh Dynamic (Spiritual):  The placebo effect, by its very nature, highlights the power of the mind and spirit over the physical body. In Scientology, the Seventh Dynamic is the urge to survive as spiritual beings. The placebo effect demonstrates the individual's inherent capacity to influence their own well-being through belief and expectation. This aligns with the concept of the Seventh Dynamic, where one's spiritual beingness and one's ability to create and cause survival play a significant role. First Dynamic (Self):  The placebo effect is intensely personal. It depends on the individual's beli...
Read more

Religion went off the rails with Atheism, Medicine went off the rails with Pharmacology.

Image
 It is easy to see where Religion went off the rails with Atheism, Buddhism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, Muslims, and the long, corrupt Catholic Church, and their hatred has been a hatred of women, housing them in sexless clothes, and close to controlling all children through schooling. 90% plus percent of nuns are allowed to become lesbians. 10% is used to fulfill the father's primal urges for natural sex. This is a natural state of a female's body, such as menstruation. Used as misdirection so the good father could harvest and sexualize children while murdering those that would raise cane or cause the hair to stand up on their real dads' necks. That is enough about the tens of millions of children in the world infected with their religious care. These are the real devils and monsters that Jesus warned us about. Without clarity or advance understanding Mom and dad let the church steel there daughter and convert them into zombies and sex slave for those priest stil...
Read more

Justification = creates the evil empires of Humanity. Justification all thing go back to Religion.

A Malaysian court has dropped money-laundering charges against former Prime Minister Najib Razak. Mr. Najib was ousted from office and convicted of corruption in 2020 concerning embezzling a multibillion-dollar sovereign wealth fund. Last year, his prison sentence was reduced to six years, and his fine was lowered to $11 million. Additionally, in November, charges of misappropriating public funds were dismissed.   One wonders why there is such grief, criminality, and deceit within the world. The reason can be summed up in one word: justification. Justification is a concept that can topple kings and dismantle governments. It is revered by a powerful group associated with the justice system. In a sense, it resembles a distorted form of the placebo effect.    Why pray when one can engage in reckless behavior instead? Some take from the weak—particularly children—their future, all so that the privileged few can play now. This leader should have been held accountable for the g...
Read more